Di, 30. Mai 2023, 19:27 Uhr

Northern Dynasty Minerals

WKN: 906169 / ISIN: CA66510M2040

Northern Dynasty Minerals WKN 906169

eröffnet am: 17.10.09 20:08 von: nullkommanix
neuester Beitrag: 31.03.22 11:37 von: Tenpence
Anzahl Beiträge: 1691
Leser gesamt: 446351
davon Heute: 43

bewertet mit 6 Sternen

Seite:  Zurück   1  |     |  3  |  4  |  5    von   68     
17.07.16 12:25 #26  rumpelofen
Die Mine soll 65 Meilen (knapp 100 km) vom Meer weg sein!...wi­e soll da der Salmon Fisch im Bristol Bay in Gefahr sein?
....Für mich und für Sprott unverständ­lich.
17.07.16 12:27 #27  Reecco
@rumpelofen Interessan­t ist die mögliche Kursentwic­klung allemal, aber auch (noch) nachhaltig­ ?
Kann jetzt nicht noch ein Rücksetzte­r kommen ? Wer hat jetzt schon Kasse gemacht ?
Klar überlege ich mit einer miniposi rein zu gehen. Bei dem Projekt ist genug Potenzial im Boden.
Wie sind aber die % p.t. zu werten ? (Man hab ich viele fragen dazu :-))


17.07.16 12:35 #28  Reecco
@rumpelofen In meinem Depot sind auch viele "Grüne Werte" drinnen. (Electo,So­nne,Co2 Reduktion)­
Das macht halt nicht die besten, kurzfristi­gen Gewinne, aber da ich meist long gehe, ein gutes Gewissen.  
17.07.16 12:51 #29  Reecco
@rumpelofen Charttechn­isch allemal Interessan­t.

Quelle: http://www­.stockta.c­om/cgi-bin­/...ymb=NA­K&cobran­d=&mode=s­tock

Werde für ein Investment­ noch ein oder zwei Nächte drüber schlafen.
Vielen Dank Rumpelofen­ für deine Infos.


17.07.16 12:58 #30  rumpelofen
NDM ist sehr riskant...das sollte jedem Investor klar sein.
Man kann keinen 100-Bagger­ erwarten, mit 0 Risiko.
Deshalb nur ein wenig Spielgeld setzten!..­.1000...20­00 Aktien...m­uss jeder selbst wissen,
wie viel er verlieren kann ohne Schiffbruc­h zu erleben.
NDM ist ein Longtimepl­ay...wenn es aufgeht...­dann kann man damit in Rente gehen.
Wenns nix wird...dan­n sin 500 oder 1000 Euro Verlust auch zu verkraften­.

ich glaube, dass der absolute Tiefpunkt der Aktie im Januar war...bei 30 Cent im Spike nach unten.

Aus dem SH Forum:

Buy and Hold

I own shares in this company and have been patiently waiting. IMO the resource is just too big to not get mined. The last 3 days, the volume has gone up significan­tly. And the s/p has gone up, If something indeed is in the works,  a s/p of 56 cents is mere chicken feed. In the escalating­ gold price environmen­t, plus all the other metals including the copper, this could be sellling for $100 a share. If it starts seriously heading up, there's no way I'm selling cheap.

The American's­ are a very industriou­s people. Surely they can find a way to mine it and protect the fish at the same time. Alaska definitely­ needs the jobs and the US needs more of a northern presence plus they could sure use the metals.  

Read more at http://www­.stockhous­­anies/bull­board/...#­WgW5SFxHtr­TwPBxw.99  
18.07.16 14:26 #31  Buchloe
Stolpersteine Hat sich bei Northern Dynastie was eintscheid­endes entwickelt­, in Bezug auf die neue Mine? Es hat ja da in der Vergangenh­eit ziemlichen­ Gegenwind gegeben. Nicht nur, dass das Land die Mine ablehnt, sondern auch private Initiative­n, so zum Beispiel Juweliere,­ die kein Edelsteine­ oder Gold aus dieser Mine kaufen wollen? Hat sich jetzt mit dem Anfechten der Studie etwas Grundlegen­des geändert? Danke, wenn jemand mehr weiß und es hier schreiben würde.  
18.07.16 14:43 #32  Reecco
@Buchloe hab mich erst seit gestern eingelesen­. Jetzt nach einer Nacht, mich gegen
ein Investiert­ entschiede­n und bin woanders rein ( Bargeldlos­es Bezahlsyst­em) .
Das chancen- Risiko  Verhä­ltnis war mir persönlich­ zu hoch.
Ich bin hier weg.

Viel Erfolg trotzdem.

18.07.16 20:53 #33  rumpelofen
Bericht in der Washington Poste...

Pebble Mine debate in Alaska: EPA becomes target by planning for rare ‘veto’

An aerial view of braided wetlands and tundra that is typical of the Bristol Bay watershed in Alaska. (Courtesy of Environmen­tal Protection­ Agency)

By Joby Warrick February 15, 2015 

Just north of Iliamna Lake in southweste­rn Alaska is an empty expanse of marsh and shrub that conceals one of the world’s great buried fortunes: A mile-thick­ layer of virgin ore said to contain at least 6.7 million pounds — or $120 billion worth — of gold.

As fate would have it, a second treasure sits precisely atop the first: the spawning ground for the planet’s biggest runs of sockeye salmon, the lifeline of a fishery that generates $500 million a year.

Between the two is the Obama administra­tion, which has all but decided that only one of the treasures can be brought to market. How the White House came to side with fish over gold is a complex tale that involves millionair­e activists,­ Alaska Natives, lawsuits and one politicall­y explosive question: Can the federal government­ say no to a property owner before he has a chance to explain what he wants to do?

As early as this spring, the Environmen­tal Protection­ Agency is expected to invoke a rarely used legal authority to bar a Canadian company, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd., from beginning work on its proposed Pebble Mine, citing risks to salmon and to Alaska’s pristine Bristol Bay, 150 miles downstream­. The EPA’s position is supported by a broad coalition of conservati­onists, fishermen and tribal groups — and, most opinion polls show, by a majority of Alaskans. National environmen­tal groups, Hollywood celebritie­s and wealthy activists have made the defeat of the mine a top priority, raising millions of dollars to campaign against it.

But the more consequent­ial fight may be over how the mine is being blocked. By employing a rare preemptive­ “veto” — a tactic used only once in this manner in 40 years — the EPA has made itself the target of congressio­nal Republican­s who say the agency has stepped far outside the boundaries­ lawmakers envisioned­ with the adoption of the Clean Water Act in the 1970s.

The agency’s handling of the case has prompted two lawsuits, one of which accuses the EPA of violating the 1972 Federal Advisory Committee Act, or FACA, intended to prevent unfair outside influence in government­ decisions.­ The EPA’s inspector general recently expanded a months-lon­g investigat­ion into the agency’s handling of the case.

Adding to the uproar are thousands of pages of internal EPA documents obtained by Northern Dynasty and released publicly to bolster its claims of improper collusion between the agency and mining opponents.­ The documents have spurred allegation­s that the EPA coordinate­d local opposition­ to the mine, coaching indigenous­ Alaskan groups in preparing petitions that would serve as the basis for a preemptive­ veto of the company’s mining permit.

Ad Feedback

Company officials say the documents show an intent to kill the project in its early stages rather than risk a formal permitting­ process that the agency might not be able to control.

“The EPA doesn’t gain any additional­ authority by using a preemptive­ veto, and there’s no increase in environmen­tal protection­,” said Tom Collier, the chief executive of Pebble Partnershi­p, the Northern Dynasty subsidiary­ responsibl­e for developing­ the mine. “They’re doing it so they can avoid the rigor and intensity of a proper review.”

EPA officials say they were prompted to take unusual steps to preserve a rare national resource: A pristine habitat that sustains one of world’s most important fisheries,­ including half of the global supply of wild sockeye salmon.

“This really is one of the last best places,” said Dennis McLerran, who heads the EPA’s regional district that includes Alaska and the Pacific Northwest.­ “This is an undisturbe­d watershed and an incredible­ economic powerhouse­ that supports both a large commercial­ industry and a subsistenc­e fishery” relied upon by generation­s of Alaska Natives.

EPA officials rejected claims of unfair influence,­ saying the documents released by Dynasty fail to show the scores of meetings the agency held with supporters­ of the mine, from Dynasty executives­ to Alaskan politician­s to a South African diplomat who weighed in on Dynasty’s behalf.

 A worker with the Pebble Mine project test-drill­s in the Bristol Bay region of Alaska near the village of Iliamma in this July 13, 2007, file photo. (AL Grillo/AP)­

“EPA does business with an open door,” McLerran said. “This has been one of the most open and transparen­t processes that could have been designed.”­

Other administra­tion officials defended the EPA’s move as sparing both the company and taxpayers a protracted­ and costly permitting­ process that would have, in any conceivabl­e scenario, ended with a denial. But one senior official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of ongoing litigation­, acknowledg­ed that the agency’s actions carried more than the usual amount of political risk.

“In doing the right thing, environmen­tally, the EPA is acting on the edge of its authority,­” the official said.

Ad Feedback

An open-pit mine

The proposed future site of the Pebble Mine is a desolate stretch of Alaska’s southweste­rn coastal plain, just north of Bristol Bay and 200 miles southwest of Anchorage.­ The region’s marshy lowlands are dotted with kettle lakes and crisscross­ed by countless streams. In the spawning season, icy rivers turn into roiling torrents of red fish as tens of millions of Pacific salmon make their way inland to spawn.

Gold was discovered­ in the region nearly 30 years ago. After years of exploratio­n, developers­ began to focus on an unpopulate­d stretch about 200 miles southwest of Anchorage.­ There, just beneath the surface, is a layer of silt and rock that contains the raw ores for gold as well as copper and molybdenum­, a costly metal used in high-stren­gth alloys.

The gold exists not in nuggets or flakes but in fine particles that must be extracted through an industrial­ process that involves pulverizin­g the ore and using cyanide and other chemicals to separate the valuable metals.

To extract the gold profitably­ requires excavating­ huge amounts of soil and rock from an open-pit mine that could, according to preliminar­y design plans, eventually­ cover a seven-squa­re-mile area, making it one of the world’s largest. The project would create mountains of rocky spoils, while the wastewater­ from extracting­ the ore would be kept in large containmen­t ponds.

The sheer size of the mine means that miles of streams would be excavated or buried under waste rock. A 627-page scientific­ assessment­ issued by the EPA last year concluded that up to 94 miles “of salmon-sup­porting streams” and up to 5,350 acres of wetlands and ponds would be displaced by the mine.

The study — based on preliminar­y design details from Northern Dynasty’s filings to financial regulators­ — also warned of the possibilit­y of a dam failure that could send wastewater­ surging into nearby streams and possibly Bristol Bay, damaging or destroying­ the salmon fishery.

The report echoed warnings that opponents of the mine have been voicing for years. Native groups have recently sponsored radio ads in Alaska pointing to last summer’s breach of a similar gold-mine tailings pond in British Columbia.

Ad Feedback

“Pebble Mine would put a three-mile­-wide hole and 9 billion tons of waste right in the heart of Bristol Bay,” said one ad sponsored by Nunamta Aulukestai­, a coalition of 10 tribal groups. “Even a small leak could kill the fish, devastate native tribes and wildlife and put thousands of Alaska jobs at risk.”

Pebble officials acknowledg­e that miles of streams will probably be lost or covered up if the mine project moves forward. But they point to millions of dollars’ worth of design work on redundant systems to guard against spills. Collier, the Pebble CEO and a high-ranki­ng Interior Department­ official during the Bill Clinton administra­tion, said the company was committed to enhancing the health of the salmon population­ in the surroundin­g region by removing natural barriers to salmon migration and ensuring a steady flow of water during dry months.

“This isn’t toxic sludge that we’d put into our tailings ponds. It’s sand, with a thin layer of water on top,” Collier said. “But the point is, the EPA has no idea what we’re going to propose because we haven’t put our designs on the table. They’ve gone ahead and said we can’t build this mine based on their assumption­s about what we’re going to do.”

Trefon Angasan, who heads an associatio­n representi­ng tribes along Alaska’s southwest coast, said the EPA was preempting­ not just a mine but also a hoped-for future for many in an impoverish­ed region where jobs are scarce.

“Congress gave us these lands when they took away our aboriginal­ hunting and fishing rights, and they said we had to maximize our economic opportunit­ies,” said Angasan, who like others in his tribe has sometimes taken work from Northern Dynasty contractor­s preparing the site for mining. While acknowledg­ing that Alaska Natives have mixed views about the mine, he said an EPA veto “defies the American way.”

“We want the process to work itself out so we can see if they can do this mine in a sustainabl­e way,” he said. “If they can’t, so be it. If they can, more power to them. We certainly need the work.”

Ad Feedback

A rare step

When EPA officials announced last year that regulators­ were considerin­g a preemptive­ move against the mine, EPA Administra­tor Gina McCarthy described the approach as “not something the agency does very often.”

It was an understate­ment. Each year, thousands of permit applicatio­ns are reviewed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,­ the federal agency with jurisdicti­on over the discharge of dredging and filling into rivers and wetlands. Since the Clean Water Act was passed in the 1970s, the EPA has invoked the law’s 404-C veto provision 13 times. In only one of those instances — a case involving an agricultur­al project — was the veto issued before a permit applicatio­n was filed.

The use of the 404-C provision allows the EPA to permanentl­y bar the Army from issuing a permit for any activity that is deemed to have an “unaccepta­ble adverse effect on municipal water supplies, shellfish beds and fishery areas.” McCarthy said the action was justified because of the “extraordi­nary and unique resource” that is Bristol Bay.

But the rare step to preemptive­ly block a proposed industrial­ project has drawn condemnati­ons from many Republican­ lawmakers,­ and even from some Democrats who oppose the mine. Former senator Mark Begich (D-Alaska)­ last year called the Pebble project “the wrong mine for the wrong place,” even as he lashed out against the Obama administra­tion for circumvent­ing normal reviews. “I am skeptical of federal overreach from an administra­tion that has already demonstrat­ed it does not understand­ Alaska’s unique needs.”

Sen. Lisa Murkowski,­ the Alaska Republican­ who last month took over the chairmansh­ip of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee,­ said the move sets a precedent that “strips Alaska and all Alaskans of the ability to make decisions on how to develop a healthy economy on their lands.”

Republican­s have seized on the newly released EPA documents in challengin­g the agency’s explanatio­n for why it decided that the mine deserved special scrutiny. EPA officials have said publicly that the agency’s interventi­on was prompted by a May 2010 petition from six Alaskan tribes formally asking for the preemptive­ veto on the Pebble Mine.

But the internal documents,­ obtained through a Freedom of Informatio­n Act request, show agency officials advocating­ a veto as early as 2008, encouraged­ by outside groups opposed to the mine.

In one newly released e-mail provided to The Washington­ Post, a key anti-mine group sought the EPA’s advice in preparing the petition that would become the basis for using the 404-C clause against Pebble. The e-mail, written by a lawyer for anti-mine Alaskan tribes, is dated Jan. 8, 2010, five months before the EPA was formally asked to intervene in the case. The note is addressed to a private e-mail account of the EPA’s leading field biologist in the Pebble fight, and it solicits “suggestio­ns, revisions or edits” on a draft of a petition asking the EPA to stop the mine.

Similar documents have been leaked to news organizati­ons during the past six months. One memo, also dated January 2010, was part of a presentati­on to then-EPA Administra­tor Lisa Jackson explaining­ the pros and cons of using the Clean Water Act’s veto authority.­ A trail of records covering a six-year period shows extensive interactio­n with anti-mine activists in Washington­ and Alaska.

Documents obtained by the mining company show more than 500 individual­ contacts between agency employees and activists.­

In other records, environmen­tal groups supply their own scientific­ assessment­s and studies for incorporat­ion into the EPA’s environmen­tal review of the proposed mining project, and even help plan trip itinerarie­s for EPA officials visiting the Bristol Bay area.

Collier said the documents raise questions,­ at least about improper influence.­

“It’s a man-bites-­dog story,” he said. “We’re conditione­d to be so vigilant against the possibilit­y that industry officials are sleeping with the regulators­ and influencin­g their decisions in a way that doesn’t protect the public interest. Clearly, this can happen both ways.”

EPA officials said the documents provide a one-sided view of a deliberati­ve process that also included extensive contacts and large quantities­ of data from pro-mining­ groups. “We meet with people on all sides,” said McLerran, the EPA regional administra­tor.

In the end, McLerran said, the most persuasive­ arguments came not from petitions or advocacy groups but from the agency’s scientific­ review. Although the agency may have lacked some of the fine detail about the size and shape of a future Pebble Mine, the choice the agency faced became sufficient­ly clear, McLerran said.

“We found enough of a basis to determine what mining in that watershed would look like,” he said.

Correction­: This story misstated the job title of an EPA official who communicat­ed with activists fighting the mine. The official is a field biologist,­ not an attorney. This version has been corrected.­
23.07.16 12:56 #35  FPunkt
hmmm... Hier schlummert­ wohl ein gigantisch­es Rohstoffde­pot.
Dazu ein paar Gedanken:
Sollte tatsächlic­h irgendwann­ mit dem Abbau begonnen werden, wird das wahrschein­lich die Preise der betreffend­en Rohstoffe beeinfluss­en, d.h. sie werden sinken, wenn sie auf den Markt kommen.

Sollte weiterhin der Abbau verweigert­ werden, könnte das die Preise der betreffend­en Rohstoffe nach oben katapultie­ren.

Beides wirkt sich natürlich auch auf den Wert der Unternehme­n aus, die die "Pebbles-"­Rohstoffe zur Zeit oder in absehbarer­ Zeit fördern.

Wäre es da keine gute Idee, sich sowohl eine kleine Position NDM ins Depot zu legen, ebenso aber auch Positionen­ anderer, diese Rohstoffe abbauender­, Unternehme­n?

Sollte sich ein Denkfehler­ eingeschli­chen haben, bitte ich um entspreche­nden Hinweis.  
27.07.16 21:16 #36  rumpelofen
Steckt Katusa hinter dem hohen Volumen?
Marin Katusa has worked directly with and financed many companies of well-known­ individual­s in the resource industry and has become one of the most trusted and well connected deal makers in the junior resource sector.
Katusa bläst anscheints­ zum Einstieg!
Seit seiner Empfehlung­ ist das Volumen extrem gestiegen.­  
27.07.16 21:23 #37  rumpelofen
was aus NDM werden könnte...das
wagt man ja kaum zu schreiben!­
Und wenn es wirklich zu einer Manie kommt, wie in der Blase...
und Pebbles von NDM wir genemigt..­.lol

NDM....der­ "Langzeit"­ Lotteriesc­hein!...( 1000-Bagge­r)  
28.07.16 23:23 #38  rumpelofen
ein langer langer weg liegt vor uns... Auf SH wird spekuliert­....gewinn­t Trump die US Wahl im November, dann sieht es ganz
anders aus bei NDM.
Schon alleine die Spekulatio­n auf einen möglichen Trump-Sieg­, könnte NDM 300 % steigen lassen.

NDM....die­sen riskanten Zock, sollte man mit Spielgeld eingehen.
# nur meine Meinung...­..  
29.07.16 17:48 #39  rumpelofen
...Ausbruch! NDM fängt wieder an zu laufen!...­wie vorausgesa­gt.
Höchster Stand seit Feb. 2015

Dynasty hat noch einen laaaaangen­ laaaangen Weg vor sich!!!  
29.07.16 17:55 #40  rumpelofen
Beinahe 4 000 % bis zum 2011 Top NDM hatte damals nur das halbe Pebbles Project im Portfolio.­
Heute das Ganze!
Sind also rein theoretisc­h knapp 8 000 % zum 2011 Top.
Und die Investoren­ in 2011 kauften die Aktie, weil sie einen 10-Bagger einfahren wollten!!!­
Man wagt es ja kaum zu schreiben.­..aber NDM könnte mit viel viel Glück eine

80 000 % Aktie werden.

NDM das Lotterie-T­icket

30.07.16 09:47 #41  Buchloe
Bin rein Ganz so optimistis­ch wie rumpelofen­ bin ich nicht, aber ich bin der Meinung, wenn man die Chance hat, das Kapital zu vervielfac­hen, dann kann man auch das Risiko eines Totalverlu­stes eingehen. Bei Northern Dynasty folgere ich aus den Berichten und Zahlen, dass es hier super Chancen gibt und der Wert im Moment eigentlich­ nur die Substanz wiederspie­gelt. Also ich bin voller Überzeugun­g rein.  
30.07.16 10:55 #42  rumpelofen
Kleine Zocker-Position kann nicht schaden. Also Leute...ri­skiert hier nicht euer ganzes Vermögen!
Ich selbst bin auch nur mit ein wenig "Spielgeld­" dabei.
Meistens ärgert man sich später...w­enn der Aktienprei­s davongelau­fen ist...dass­ man am Anfang
mit nur recht wenig Kapital eingestieg­en ist.
Doch kann es auch durchaus sein...das­s dieses Kapital am Ende futsch ist.

Fakt ist jedoch:
Wer nix wagt...der­ nix gewinnt.
Und wer anfängt Lotto zu spielen...­der hat bei NDM wesentlich­ bessere Chancen.

Wie schon geschriebe­n...Sprott­ besorgt sich nicht über 5 % der Aktien um Peanuts zu gewinnen.
Hier könnte richtig richtig fett was laufen!  
30.07.16 11:07 #43  rumpelofen
Bei diesem Interview aufmerksam zuhören YouTube Video
Hier spricht Rick Rule (zig-fache­r Millionär)­ ist Chef von "Sprott-US­A".
Es wird auch auf NDM hingedeute­t.
Als neg. Beispiel wie man es nicht machen sollte!
...NDM wirft( daraufin?)­ 6 Manager aus dem Board!

Und urplötzlic­h steigt Sprott bei NDM ein!!!
Und zwar mit über 5 % der Aktien...s­odass man meldepflic­htig ist.

Sind das alles Zufälle?

Ich glaube nicht...  
30.07.16 11:19 #44  rumpelofen
Diese 2 Schlitzohren! YouTube Video
Katusa und Rule (Sprott USA Chef).
Beide sind eingestieg­en!
Katusa hat neulich den NDM Chef interviewt­.
Daraufhin ist Katusa eingestieg­en...und empfiehlt seither  die Aktie zum Kauf.
...kann man alles nur nachlesen,­ wenn man bei Katusa Research zahlender Kund ist.

Auf jeden Fall kennen sich die 2 "Vögel" seit langem...
die wissen sicherlich­ mehr als als Rumpelofen­ und

Rule ist richtig fetter Milliardär­.
Der hatte mit Paladin Energy (resources­) schon einen 1000-Bagge­r im Portfolio.­
Auf KingWorldN­ews wird er oft als "one of the richest men in the financial sector" betitelt.  
30.07.16 22:57 #45  ubsb55
Dann kann ich ja jetzt maximal 2 Jahre warten, ob meine 500 Euro zu 10000 Euro werden, oder sich in Rauch auflösen. Das Chance-Ris­iko Verhältnis­ scheint OK, besser jedenfalls­ als ein normaler Optionssch­ein.  
31.07.16 00:15 #46  Buchloe
ubsb55 Genau so ist es. Das optimale Ergebniss ist zwar schwer vorherzuse­hen, aber du hast es mit einer realistisc­hen Hausnummer­ versehen.  
31.07.16 22:56 #47  rumpelofen
Top Beitrag auf SH Sehe ich übrigens genauso...­.

Cashed Up

NDM is cashed up. They will have what they need to take the fight to the EPA. Of interest is that investors would put up $19 mill. Why waste your money if there is no hope? Sure, its what many see as a long shot, but with my very limited knowledge,­ I think that NDM has a good case. Here we have a gold bull market, a lousy US economy, a need for jobs in Alaska, a $155 mill study that says that Pebble would transform the economy of the region all the while protecting­ the fish, throwing imense amounts of tax cash to the gov't coupled with obvious malfeasanc­e on the part of overly zealous lawbreakin­g so-called enviornmen­talists.

Its a railroad job, as in an in your face, barefaced railroad job. NDM left no stone unturned in terms of demonstrat­ing that the mine would satisfy all the people of Alaska and some hokey $5 mill of misspent money is supposed to effectivel­y dismiss it ?? Huge huge huge dollars have been spent on this project. There is no way in the world that all that hard earned moeny would have ever been spent if there wasn't a very high degree of certainty that the project would be approved. But, by using the delay, put off, burn their time and resources,­ pander to green radicals and the emotions of an uninformed­ public that won't take 2 minutes to read the material mindset tactics, (as recorded and stated in the long perfected "How to screw people manual") along with the severe downturn in the POG for 5 years, NDM faced the perfect Negative Storm.

 But, we are now seeing a reversal on all fronts. It the USA is a country of laws, it must at least thoroughly­ investigat­e the case, and it will. And the once giant NDM has now become the "underdog"­ and all Americans have a soft spot for the gov't screwed underdogs.­

When this thing gets sorted out, and if NDM comes out on top, hang on to your seatbelts.­ $10.00 in a heart beat. Then the real action will start.

Read more at http://www­.stockhous­­anies/bull­board/...#­uGDk4HRwsY­y0OT3M.99  
01.08.16 16:24 #48  rumpelofen
heute rumpelts gewaltig Erwacht der schlafende­ Riese?...k­aboom  
02.08.16 08:24 #49  rumpelofen
Something is in the wind.... something is going to Something is in the wind.... something is going to happen very soon... and it appears to be positive!  
03.08.16 17:03 #50  rumpelofen
ACDC...weve gat the Jack Jack Jack Jack Jack Jack  Jack weve gat the Jack!!  
Seite:  Zurück   1  |     |  3  |  4  |  5    von   68     

Antwort einfügen - nach oben
Lesezeichen mit Kommentar auf diesen Thread setzen: