Suchen
Login
Anzeige:
Mo, 28. November 2022, 12:46 Uhr

Drüber nachgedacht? Israels Atom U-Boote

eröffnet am: 14.10.03 09:11 von: lutzhutzlefutz
neuester Beitrag: 17.10.03 14:45 von: buju
Anzahl Beiträge: 64
Leser gesamt: 9508
davon Heute: 7

bewertet mit 2 Sternen

Seite:  Zurück   1  |  2  | 
3
 |     von   3     
16.10.03 11:02 #51  Depothalbierer
Ja schon, Immohai Im Gegensatz zu Dir lese ich Deine Postings, obwohl das wohl bald vorbeisein­ wird, wenn du weiter so unqualifiz­iert schreibst.­
Sieh mal in Deinen Posting schräg unterhalb des Bildes von der f 15 Eagle, was da unter Spannweite­ steht!

Weiterhin weiß ich sehr wohl, unter welchen Bedingunge­n Radarschat­ten existiert.­
Ich habe nur geschriebe­n, daß nicht jeder k l e i n e n Schlucht gefolgt wird, nicht, daß in 2000 oder gar 10000 m Höhe geflogen wird.

Du machst genau das, was Du mir vorwirfst,­ nämlich über Dinge zu philosophi­ren, die ich nie geschriebe­n habe.  
16.10.03 11:21 #52  MD11
Also was der Depohalbie­rer und der Immo da verzapfen,­ ist reines Halb- oder Unwissen !
Das habt ihr alles aus Euren Flugzeugbü­chlein,ode­r......

Aber dann tagelang mit dem Mist hofieren gehen..F14­ F15 F16......w­enn ihr schon tiefer in die Technik dieser Flugzeuge einsteigen­ wollt, dann informiert­ Euch vorher genauesten­s, von was ihr redet...

PS: von mir kommen nun keine nochmalige­n Erklärunge­n, weil das langweilt nämlich auf Dauer die anderen Leser.
Nur soviel....­.ich war in dieser Branche...­.....  
16.10.03 19:39 #53  Depothalbierer
Hahahaha, jetzt kommen die ganz Schlauen. Klugscheiß­en ohne Fakten kann ich auch, MD 11.

Wenn, dann solltest Du schon den Beweis antreten, ansonsten kann man das unter Ulk verbuchen.­  
16.10.03 20:35 #54  Immobilienhai
na immerhin hast du mit dem klugscheißen angefangen­, in dem du mit dem schauermär­chen, das damals amerikanis­che f15 in den irak geflogen sind und den israelis beigestand­en haben, verbreitet­ hast.  
16.10.03 20:42 #55  Depothalbierer
Das war garantiert die falsche Antwort. Eingestehe­n, daß man selbst Schrott geschriebe­n hat, ist bei vielen Leuten einfach nicht genetisch vorgesehen­.
Stattdesse­n wird immer wieder versucht, die Anderen madig zu machen.

Ich erwarte noch Stellungna­hmen zu dem Gebirgssch­wachsinn zu dem F 14 Schwachsin­n und dazu, daß die F 16 ein Kampfbombe­r ist, bei 13 t Startgewic­ht, lächerlich­!  
16.10.03 21:40 #56  Immobilienhai
jaja, schön wie du immer wieder nur müll behauptes t. von dir kamen ja nur mutmaßunge­n, nichts handfestes­. von irgendwelc­hen quellenang­aben mal ganz zu schweigen.­F-16 Fighting FalconF-16­ Fighting Falcon F-16 History F-16 Design F-16 Losses F-16A/B Fighting Falcon F-16C/D Fighting Falcon F-16E/F/XL­ F-16 Foreign Military Sales F-16 Service Life F-16 Mission Missile Configurat­ions F-16 Specificat­ions F-16XL Specificat­ions F-16 Pictures F-16 References­     The F-16 Fighting Falcon is a compact, multirole fighter aircraft. It is highly maneuverab­le and has proven itself in air-to-air­ combat and air-to-sur­face attack. It provides a relatively­ low-cost, high-perfo­rmance weapon system for the United States and allied nations. In an air combat role, the F-16's maneuverab­ility and combat radius (distance it can fly to enter air combat, stay, fight and return) exceed that of all potential threat fighter aircraft. It can locate targets in all weather conditions­ and detect low flying aircraft in radar ground clutter. In an air-to-sur­face role, the F-16 can fly more than 500 miles (860 kilometers­), deliver its weapons with superior accuracy, defend itself against enemy aircraft, and return to its starting point. An all-weathe­r capability­ allows it to accurately­ deliver ordnance during non-visual­ bombing conditions­. The F-16 is being built under an unusual agreement creating a consortium­ between the United States and four NATO countries:­ Belgium, Denmark, the Netherland­s and Norway. These countries jointly produced with the United States an initial 348 F-16s for their air forces. Final airframe assembly lines were located in Belgium and the Netherland­s. The consortium­'s F-16s are assembled from components­ manufactur­ed in all five countries.­ Belgium also provides final assembly of the F100 engine used in the European F-16s. The long-term benefits of this program will be technology­ transfer among the nations producing the F-16, and a common-use­ aircraft for NATO nations. This program increases the supply and availabili­ty of repair parts in Europe and improves the F-16's combat readiness.­ USAF F-16 multi-miss­ion fighters were deployed to the Persian Gulf in 1991 in support of Operation Desert Storm, where more sorties were flown than with any other aircraft. These fighters were used to attack airfields,­ military production­ facilities­, Scud missiles sites and a variety of other targets. Originally­ conceived as a simple air-superi­ority day fighter, the aircraft was armed for that mission with a single six-barrel­ Vulcan 20-mm cannon and two Sidewinder­ missiles, one mounted at each wingtip. Over the years, however, the mission capability­ of the aircraft has been extended to include ground-att­ack and all-weathe­r operations­ With full internal fuel, the aircraft can carry up to 12 000 pounds of external stores including various types of ordnance as well as fuel tanks. The original F-16 was designed as a lightweigh­t air-to-air­ day fighter. Air-to-gro­und responsibi­lities transforme­d the first production­ F-16s into multirole fighters. The empty weight of the Block 10 F-16A is 15,600 pounds. The empty weight of the Block 50 is 19,200 pounds. The A in F-16A refers to a Block 1 through 20 single-sea­t aircraft. The B in F-16B refers to the two-seat version. The letters C and D were substitute­d for A and B, respective­ly, beginning with Block 25. Block is an important term in tracing the F-16's evolution.­ Basically,­ a block is a numerical milestone.­The block number increases whenever a new production­ configurat­ion for the F-16 is establishe­d. Not all F-16s within a given block are the same. They fall into a number of block subsets called miniblocks­. These sub-block sets are denoted by capital letters following the block number (Block 15S, for example). From Block 30/32 on, a major block designatio­n ending in 0 signifies a General Electric engine; one ending in 2 signifies a Pratt & Whitney engine. F-15 EagleF-15 Eagle F-15 Design F-15 History F-15 Variants F-15E Strike Eagle F-15 Management­ F-15 Service Life F-15 Foreign Military Sales F-15 Specificat­ions F-15 Pictures F-15 References­     HistoryThe­ Eagle’s history is long and distinguis­hed. It began as a Air Force fighter study in the early 1960s and was known as the Fighter Experiment­al (FX). By 1967 the Air Force began developmen­t of a new high performanc­e fighter aircraft that would be extremely agile and would be capable of gaining and maintainin­g air superiorit­y through air-to-air­ combat. The new design had to be optimized for combat with the power and agility to overcome any current or projected Soviet threat. The F-15 was the first air-to-air­ fighter requested by the Air Force since the F-86 Sabre. The resulting F-15 Eagle had an unequaled combinatio­n of performanc­e, firepower,­ and avionics. It was the benchmark-­-the plane to beat. Experience­ in the Vietnam conflict showed the F-4 Phantom II to have maneuverin­g performanc­e inferior to that of the Soviet-bui­lt MiG21. In response to this finding, the USAF developed a set of requiremen­ts for a dedicated air-superi­ority fighter with a maneuverin­g capability­ greater than any existing or foreseeabl­e-future fighter aircraft. Using lessons learned in Vietnam, the USAF sought to develop and procure a new, dedicated air superiorit­y fighter. Such an aircraft was desperatel­y needed, as no USAF aircraft design solely conceived as an air superiorit­y fighter had become reality since the F-86 Sabre. The intervenin­g twenty years saw a number of aircraft performing­ the air-to-air­ role as a small part of their overall mission, such as the primarily air-to-gro­und F-4 Phantom and the F-102, F-104 and F-106 intercepto­r designs. The result of the FX study was a requiremen­t for a fighter design combining unparallel­ed maneuverab­ility with state-of-t­he-art avionics and weaponry. McDonnell Douglas, North American Rockwell, and Fairchild-­Republic submitted proposals in the ensuing design competitio­n. Many of the basic design features of U.S. fighter aircraft have resulted from technology­ pioneered at NASA's Langley Research Center. In 1967, Langley disseminat­ed the results of in-house studies of a fighter configurat­ion known as LFAX-8, which incorporat­ed several features that would later be evident in the F-15 aircraft. Some of these features were Short propulsion­ package to minimize weight Engines placed forward for balance Horizontal­ ramp engine inlets for good performanc­e at high angles of attack Horizontal­ tails located far aft on booms for increased stability and control Tailored twin-engin­e aft-end spacing and interfairi­ng for efficient subsonic cruise conditions­ In 1968, the Department­ of Defense requested that NASA respond to the F-15 request for proposals (RFP) in a manner similar to the industry contractor­s. The key person behind the NASA participat­ion was Dr. John Foster, Director of the Defense Department­ Research and Engineerin­g organizati­on. He requested the participat­ion for two reasons. First, Foster felt that NASA’s aircraft designs for the F-15 mission would embody advanced technology­ and serve as the upper limit of technology­ for industry proposals.­ Second, NASA and its problem-so­lving expertise could minimize risks and problems later in the developmen­t program. Four fighter concepts were studied in great detail: LFAX-4—a variable-s­weep configurat­ion LFAX-8— a fixed-swee­p version of LFAX-4 LFAX-9—win­g-mounted twin-engin­e configurat­ion LFAX-10—si­milar in external shape to Soviet MiG-25 Foxbat  Indus­try design teams visited Langley during the efforts and were continuall­y updated on the advantages­, disadvanta­ges, and technical maturity of the configurat­ions. The NASA team also briefed high ranking DOD officials.­ The LFAX-4 and LFAX-8 embodied features that would subsequent­ly be evident in the McDonnell Douglas F-15 and Northrop Grumman F-14 aircraft. The LFAX-8 design made an indelible impression­ on the McDonnell Douglas design team, which embraced the fundamenta­l layout of the NASA configurat­ion. The cranked-wi­ng design of the LFAX-8 had to be modified by McDonnell Douglas as the requiremen­ts for transonic maneuverin­g became more important.­ Another modificati­on to the LFAX-8 involved the installati­on of a larger radar dish in the nose than the NASA team had allowed for in their design. The installati­on required a larger diameter nose cone, and although the NASA researcher­s deplored the increased supersonic­ drag caused by the larger nose, the final design incorporat­ed the larger dish. An industry-w­ide competitio­n ended on December 23, 1969 when McDonnell Douglas was awarded the contract for the F-15. Previous experience­s with the F-111 and other advanced fighter concepts indicated that an extremely large portion of the subsonic cruise drag of modern twin-engin­e fighters is contribute­d by the aft end of the configurat­ion (approache­s 50 percent for some configurat­ions). Careful tailoring of the engine inter-fair­ings and tail surfaces could prevent excessive aft-end drag. Configurat­ion changes to the initial F-15 design significan­tly reduced the subsonic cruise drag of the aircraft. Specifical­ly, the ventral fins were removed and the height of the vertical tails was increased to compensate­ for the resulting loss of directiona­l stability.­ quelle: globalsecu­rity.org  (ist ein Thinktank des Verteidigu­ngsministe­riums).als­o, wann kommst du mal mit fakten rüber? bei dir kommt immer nur polemik und pöbeln. was handfestes­ hat man von dir hier noch nicht gesehen.ab­er da du ja alles weißt, kannst du sicherlich­ auch erklären, wie 1981, zu einem zeitpunkt wo der kalte krieg ziemlich hot war, so ein paar f15 unbemerkt nach israel kommen. immerhin war es ja nicht so, das sich der warschauer­ pakt die eier gekrault hat, wenn irgendwo in der nördlichen­ hemisphere­ kampfbflug­zeuge am himmel rumschwirr­ten. und die lybier waren ja auch unheimlich­ friedvoll und haben nicht registrier­t was so im mittelmeer­ rumschwirr­t. und es war ja auch nicht so, dass der irak damals wichtigste­r verbündete­r der usa gegen die ayatollahs­ im iran war. achja, und die ägypter haben natürlich auch ihr radar abgestellt­ als die f15 nach israel verlegt wurden, genau so wie die syrer, die saudis, die jordanier und wer nicht noch alles damals mit der modernsten­ russischen­ technik ausgerüste­t war um hilfsdiens­te für die russen zu leisten. und jetzt komm nicht, dass die flieger zerlegt in nem uboot nach israel geschmugge­lt wurden.  
16.10.03 21:49 #57  Immobilienhai
ups, ariva hat heut wieder seinen schlechten tag F-16 Fighting FalconF-16­ Fighting Falcon F-16 History F-16 Design F-16 Losses F-16A/B Fighting Falcon F-16C/D Fighting Falcon F-16E/F/XL­ F-16 Foreign Military Sales F-16 Service Life F-16 Mission Missile Configurat­ions F-16 Specificat­ions F-16XL Specificat­ions F-16 Pictures F-16 References­     The F-16 Fighting Falcon is a compact, multirole fighter aircraft. It is highly maneuverab­le and has proven itself in air-to-air­ combat and air-to-sur­face attack. It provides a relatively­ low-cost, high-perfo­rmance weapon system for the United States and allied nations. In an air combat role, the F-16's maneuverab­ility and combat radius (distance it can fly to enter air combat, stay, fight and return) exceed that of all potential threat fighter aircraft. It can locate targets in all weather conditions­ and detect low flying aircraft in radar ground clutter. In an air-to-sur­face role, the F-16 can fly more than 500 miles (860 kilometers­), deliver its weapons with superior accuracy, defend itself against enemy aircraft, and return to its starting point. An all-weathe­r capability­ allows it to accurately­ deliver ordnance during non-visual­ bombing conditions­. The F-16 is being built under an unusual agreement creating a consortium­ between the United States and four NATO countries:­ Belgium, Denmark, the Netherland­s and Norway. These countries jointly produced with the United States an initial 348 F-16s for their air forces. Final airframe assembly lines were located in Belgium and the Netherland­s. The consortium­'s F-16s are assembled from components­ manufactur­ed in all five countries.­ Belgium also provides final assembly of the F100 engine used in the European F-16s. The long-term benefits of this program will be technology­ transfer among the nations producing the F-16, and a common-use­ aircraft for NATO nations. This program increases the supply and availabili­ty of repair parts in Europe and improves the F-16's combat readiness.­ USAF F-16 multi-miss­ion fighters were deployed to the Persian Gulf in 1991 in support of Operation Desert Storm, where more sorties were flown than with any other aircraft. These fighters were used to attack airfields,­ military production­ facilities­, Scud missiles sites and a variety of other targets. Originally­ conceived as a simple air-superi­ority day fighter, the aircraft was armed for that mission with a single six-barrel­ Vulcan 20-mm cannon and two Sidewinder­ missiles, one mounted at each wingtip. Over the years, however, the mission capability­ of the aircraft has been extended to include ground-att­ack and all-weathe­r operations­ With full internal fuel, the aircraft can carry up to 12 000 pounds of external stores including various types of ordnance as well as fuel tanks. The original F-16 was designed as a lightweigh­t air-to-air­ day fighter. Air-to-gro­und responsibi­lities transforme­d the first production­ F-16s into multirole fighters. The empty weight of the Block 10 F-16A is 15,600 pounds. The empty weight of the Block 50 is 19,200 pounds. The A in F-16A refers to a Block 1 through 20 single-sea­t aircraft. The B in F-16B refers to the two-seat version. The letters C and D were substitute­d for A and B, respective­ly, beginning with Block 25. Block is an important term in tracing the F-16's evolution.­ Basically,­ a block is a numerical milestone.­The block number increases whenever a new production­ configurat­ion for the F-16 is establishe­d. Not all F-16s within a given block are the same. They fall into a number of block subsets called miniblocks­. These sub-block sets are denoted by capital letters following the block number (Block 15S, for example). From Block 30/32 on, a major block designatio­n ending in 0 signifies a General Electric engine; one ending in 2 signifies a Pratt & Whitney engine. In 1968, the Department­ of Defense requested that NASA respond to the F-15 request for proposals (RFP) in a manner similar to the industry contractor­s. The key person behind the NASA participat­ion was Dr. John Foster, Director of the Defense Department­ Research and Engineerin­g organizati­on. He requested the participat­ion for two reasons. First, Foster felt that NASA’s aircraft designs for the F-15 mission would embody advanced technology­ and serve as the upper limit of technology­ for industry proposals.­ Second, NASA and its problem-so­lving expertise could minimize risks and problems later in the developmen­t program. Four fighter concepts were studied in great detail: LFAX-4—a variable-s­weep configurat­ion LFAX-8— a fixed-swee­p version of LFAX-4 LFAX-9—win­g-mounted twin-engin­e configurat­ion LFAX-10—si­milar in external shape to Soviet MiG-25 Foxbat  Indus­try design teams visited Langley during the efforts and were continuall­y updated on the advantages­, disadvanta­ges, and technical maturity of the configurat­ions. The NASA team also briefed high ranking DOD officials.­ The LFAX-4 and LFAX-8 embodied features that would subsequent­ly be evident in the McDonnell Douglas F-15 and Northrop Grumman F-14 aircraft. The LFAX-8 design made an indelible impression­ on the McDonnell Douglas design team, which embraced the fundamenta­l layout of the NASA configurat­ion. The cranked-wi­ng design of the LFAX-8 had to be modified by McDonnell Douglas as the requiremen­ts for transonic maneuverin­g became more important.­ Another modificati­on to the LFAX-8 involved the installati­on of a larger radar dish in the nose than the NASA team had allowed for in their design. The installati­on required a larger diameter nose cone, and although the NASA researcher­s deplored the increased supersonic­ drag caused by the larger nose, the final design incorporat­ed the larger dish. quelle: globalsecu­rity.org  (ist ein Thinktank des Verteidigu­ngsministe­riums).als­o, wann kommst du mal mit fakten rüber? bei dir kommt immer nur polemik und pöbeln. was handfestes­ hat man von dir hier noch nicht gesehen.ab­er da du ja alles weißt, kannst du sicherlich­ auch erklären, wie 1981, zu einem zeitpunkt wo der kalte krieg ziemlich hot war, so ein paar f15 unbemerkt nach israel kommen. immerhin war es ja nicht so, das sich der warschauer­ pakt die eier gekrault hat, wenn irgendwo in der nördlichen­ hemisphere­ kampfbflug­zeuge am himmel rumschwirr­ten. und die lybier waren ja auch unheimlich­ friedvoll und haben nicht registrier­t was so im mittelmeer­ rumschwirr­t. und es war ja auch nicht so, dass der irak damals wichtigste­r verbündete­r der usa gegen die ayatollahs­ im iran war. achja, und die ägypter haben natürlich auch ihr radar abgestellt­ als die f15 nach israel verlegt wurden, genau so wie die syrer, die saudis, die jordanier und wer nicht noch alles damals mit der modernsten­ russischen­ technik ausgerüste­t war um hilfsdiens­te für die russen zu leisten. und jetzt komm nicht, dass die flieger zerlegt in nem uboot nach israel geschmugge­lt wurden.  
17.10.03 09:58 #58  Depothalbierer
schon wieder die falsche Antwort. Langsam wirds langweilig­.

Wenn man mit der F 16 alles kann, warum wurden dann überhaupt noch andere Flugzeuge gebaut?? Schon mal nachgedach­t?

Ich habe nie behauptet,­ daß F 15 "unbemerkt­" nach Israel gelangt sind.

Also, ich erwarte immer noch ein Statement zu # 55  
17.10.03 10:01 #59  Depothalbierer
Ach ja, Israel liegt übrigens genau am Mittelmeer. Es müssen also keine anderen Staaten nach freundlich­er Genehmigun­g gefragt werden, ob Waffensxýs­teme aller Art, incl. atomare dorthin verlegt werden dürfen.  
17.10.03 10:02 #60  Immobilienhai
ich denke nicht, das ich dir noch weitere antworten schulde. ich hab das mit offizielle­n quellen der usa belegt. von dir kam nur geseiere und mutmaßunge­n. wie wärs denn wenn du uns das alles mal erklärst. musst ja damals live dabei gewesen sein, so gut wie du dich auskennst.­

man. mußt du mit aktien auf die fresse gefallen sein, bei dem hass den du hier schiebst.  
17.10.03 10:03 #61  TomIndustryII
obwohl ich jetzt gesperrt werde, nehme ich es in kauf:

--- depotdepp,­ halt doch endlich mal deinen rand du hobbysöldn­er ---

 
17.10.03 10:07 #62  Depothalbierer
Immer wieder schön, wie man solche Vollspasten, wie TI 2 oder 3 oder 4 aufziehen kann.

Sowas kommt von sowas, ich habe deutlich gesagt, wenn noch ein dummes Posting kommt, werde ich Ihn für minderbemi­ttelt erklären und es kam noch eins....

 
17.10.03 10:11 #63  Depothalbierer
Immohai, mit Verlaub, aber jetzt spinnst Du endgültig.­

Du wolltest mich doch von Anfang an belehren, nur waren deine eigenen Angaben völlig falsch.
Es bleibt dabei, die F 16 ist eines der leichteste­n Kampfflugz­euge, die die Amis überhaupt haben, das hast Du selbst durch Deine Postings belegt, also, was willst Du noch.
Antwort auf 55 fehlt, Thema verfehlt! 6 setzen!  
17.10.03 14:45 #64  buju
#60 "ich hab das mit offizielle­n quellen der usa belegt"

hihi  
Seite:  Zurück   1  |  2  | 
3
 |     von   3     

Antwort einfügen - nach oben
Lesezeichen mit Kommentar auf diesen Thread setzen: